Online Communities Essay examples -- Internet Chats Web Cyberspace Ess

Online Communities Ken Griffey Jr. is a well-known name in the world of major(ip) League Baseball. Before the Seattle Mariners traded Griffey Jr. to the Cincinnati Reds, he was an absolute phenomenal baseball player. Since being traded, he has been nothing but disappointment to the Reds organization. The following is a communion between the two members in an online community at ESPN.com. crc29 Asked if hes happy that hes still with Cincinnati, Griffey said, What does it matter? This game is not about being happy. Its about wins and losses. ...and this is the same ridicule who once said when he was shopping the market that the important thing do is go somewhere where hell be happy? And he wonders why mess always think hes full of crap? Just answer the damn question Griffey, and stop with the feel sorry for me type of quotes that are consistently glide path out of your mouth on a daily basis The guy is so melodramatic Thats why hes constantly getting picked on (GRIFFE Y, 2/24)KREIJO1 initially his intent was to go to Cincinnati under the belief that he would be happy. Things havent worked out that way so far. Funny how you jump Griffey who has neer been arrested, never beat his wife, never done drugs and you attack him for the types of quotes he makes. Get off his back and go after someone who deserves it. Why does his alleged melodrama annoy you so much? Hes a harmless fvcking athlete and you despise him but dont know d1ck about him personally. Get off your soapbox your opinion, like your friendship of Griffey is worthless. (GRIFFEY, 2/24)crc29 I didnt get on him for beating his wife. I got on him for being a whiney bitch......which he is. So King Kenny is unhappy...how the he... ... was in The Virtual Community by Rheingold (92). People came to the websites sharing same interests, and purpose. It is also similar because there is no actual face-to-face contact with the community. Therefore, it allows them to speak munificently as they wanted, without having to worry about confrontation. The cohesive relationships were shown at the Yankees forum rather than the MLB main directory. The competitive relationships were formed through disagreement and vulgar languages. The competition drives sight to research more statistics to ambush their opposition, which I think is a good effect of competition because it helps them learn more about their favorite topic. Overall, I confide that these online communities are a positive aspect of society and people should keep using and share their experiences, ideas, and thoughts on their common interests.

Hitler In germany :: essays research papers

The point of this essay is to prove that although Hitler came to power at heart the letter of the honor" he did not come to power at heart the spirit of the law.Hitler was appointed Chancellor on the 30th of January 1933, with only two other Nazis in the Cabinet, this was though to be enough to control him, by Van Papen and the conservatives. Hitler persuaded President Hindenburg to hold new elections in March 1933, in the hope he would gain an over every(prenominal) majority. However in the new elections Hitler controlled Prussia through Gring (Cabinet Minister) and the other two fifths of Germany through Frick (the other Cabinet Minister). With Nazi appointed police chiefs and local anesthetic government heads, the Nazis had the legal power to intimidate the electorate. By the end of February 1933 Hitler was Chancellor and in control of police and local government, all legally and not within the spirit of the constitution.On the 27th of February 1933 a half-mad Dutch Commu nist called Van der Lubbe was found wondering in the ashes of the burning Reichstag. This provided the Nazis with the opportunity to persuade Hindenburg to sign an want decree (composed by Frick) on February the 28th, suspending civil liberties and allowing the central Government to run regional governments deemed unable to run them selves. By the end of April, twenty five jet people had been taken into protective custody in Prussia alone. Under the decree Frick was able to take over areas not already controlled by Gring. Because of the suicide clause these actions were legal however they were definitely not within the democratic spirit of the constitution.In the Reichstag elections of March 1933 the Nazis increased their control from 33.1% in December 1932 to 43.9%. This increase can be attributed to the Nazis strong stance on Communism. The Nazis were cognise for their hatred of Communism, the middle class voted Nazi because of that policy. Joseph Goebbels propaganda machine wa s also very good at acquiring votes. Nazi intimation by the now auxiliary policeman (in Prussia), the S.A. and S.S. plus the threat of unemployment by Nazi run organisations also helped increase Nazi votes. With their rightwing and Catholic allies the Nazis were now in a position to take for power legally. Hitler clearly gained power legally as regards election results but as to how he got the results it is clear he acted both illegally and against the constitution.

Decriminalization Vs. Prohibition :: essays research papers

Decriminalization vs. Prohibition     The idea of Drug Prohibition do sense lower the availability of drugsby the use of law enforcement. Unfortunately, Drug Prohibition means heavycosts while proving to be ineffective and counterproductive.     I was thirteen when I saw drugs for the first time. I was with some ofmy friends that live down the road from me. They asked me if I wanted to gethigh with them. At the time, I didnt know what getting high meant, so I askedthem. One of them pulled ut a long slender object, similar to a cigarette, buttwisted on either end. They told me it was something special. I was stillbewildered. They said "Its pot, you know, marijuana?" Immediately I said no.I had seen several anti-dug commercials, all with the same motto, "Just label No".I felt so good about myself. I had done the right thing. I said no to myfriends, which is a very vexed decision to make at that age. I was not going tobe one of those sad cases, where my life is wasted away. I was not going to bea crazed addict, who would stop at nothing to get a hit. I was not going to bedodging the law my whole life. I was going to be everything I wanted to be, anddrugs were definitely not going to get in the way. I promised myself I wouldnot end up deal Jimi Hendrix, or Janis Joplin, both found dead by and by overdoses,because I had the power to say no. I had read stories and seen news flashesabout the side make of some drugs. I had read newspaper articles about populate in Rome, which is just a few minutes away, dying of heroin overdoses. Ihad seen people on TV that were alive, but were not conscious of theirsurroundings, because of drug use. Their lives were basically over. I hadlistened to speakers preach that drugs were one of the Devils tools. There wasno way I would stock-still consider ever trying them, because once a person starts,they cant stop.     It was a few years later that I heard the other side of the story. Ilearned that not only were we losing the war on drugs, but that the war had beencorrupted. The government was wasting money on something without a cause, orhope. It wasnt long after that when I tried marijuana for the first time. Iremember it well. I was with my sister, who was the only person that I couldnt

Frank and Rita in the First Scene of the Play :: Educating Rita Plays Willy Russell Essays

straight-from-the-shoulder and Rita in the First Scene of the PlayTo look for how Russell presents the characters of Frank and Ritaduring the first scene of the play.Russells play has been created to stretch out and grab the audiencesattention, feelings and emotions right from the beginning of the play.In my essay I will aim to explore how he establishes the charactersroles and how they interact with each other during the first scene ofthe play.Firstly, with the quote he manages a gulp at the whisky. Russellpresents Frank as an alcoholic, this is because he is adequate to(p) to take agulp of whisky without gasping or coughing so this shows that he isused to taking such large amounts. This may then leave alone to the audiencefeeling that Frank maybe an insecure person, as he has to turn todrink for comfort and security.Then when Rita first appears, with the quote Its that bleedin handleon that door, you wanna get it resolved Russell is establishing thecharacter of the play and th eir attitudes and distinctivepersonalities. With Rita she is shown as a boisterous person. This isclearly exposed with the denominations BleednYou wanna get it fixed asthese words are commanding techniques and it shows to the audience ina short amount of time that Rita is in control. This would shock themas Rita is speaking improperly towards the teacher. Also with I think your marvellousyoure the first breath of freshair that has been in this room for ages. Russell now presents Frankas a flirtatious person who is attempting to chat up Rita. With thewords first breath of fresh air this show s that Frank doesnt have umteen young fresh minds in his office to teach. The audience may feelsorry for Frank as he seems to have a lonely intent in his darkenedoffice and also how he seems to have given up on life.Following on from this with the quote look at those tits. Russelluses the word tits to show to emphasise even more to the audiencethat Rita is different to the other students. She i s an open mindedand loud person who unintentionally makes herself out to be a personwho is not afraid to say what she believes. So as a consequence theaudience may be startled as Rita is not playing in the normal pupil toteacher register. Also they may feel that Rita is a loud person who istrying to cover up for being anxious(p) one.To add to this, Wait a minute listen to meyoure gonna bleedin well

A Look At Cheap Amusements Essay -- essays research papers

An extremely interesting, but ever-contradictory sociological study of sexual relationsis presented in the Kathy Peiss oblige Cheap Amusements . The reason I say that it is ever-contradictory is that the arguments are presented for both the benefit of cheap amusements for a woman s place in society and for the reinforcement of her place. In one breath, Peiss says that mixed-sex fun could be a source of autonomy and pleasure as well as a cause of a woman s keep oppression. The following arguments will show that, based on the events and circumstances described in Cheap Amusements , the changes in theways that leisure time is spent by women has thus benefited them in both the workplace and at home. This position requires a closer look at specific leisure activities where and with whom they are spent, and the ultimate matter that these activities had on society and sexuality roles. More significantly however, is how the establishment of leisure activities for women came about, ra ther than the simple change in availability of such activities. First permit s look at Peiss s position on the matter of how cheap amusements challenged sexual urge traditions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.What does Peiss rush to say about women s roles at the turn of the century? Peiss argues initially that young women experimented with new cultural forms in terms of sexual expressiveness and social interaction with men, linking heterosocial culture to a sense of modern individuality and personal style. Creating this style was an assertion of self. Peissquickly discounts these assertions by saying that without economic independence, such freedoms are hollow. Peiss s essay claims to focus on the role of working women in fostering change from a homosocial to a heterosocial culture, but as we can see from the in the beginning quote, there is still what seems to be a hint of male dominance in preventing the experience of true leisure. By this we can see that Peiss beli eves women were gainsay gender norms, but doing so under the implied watchful eye of the male-dominated culture.One very interesting point that Peiss makes is that there is now a marketplace for leisure time. This market included such activities as attending shows at a nickelodeon, riding the trolley, and, especially in Manhattan, spending the day at Coney Islan... ...not explicitly challenging the social conditions of the day, but implicitly doing so. I agree with Peiss s statement that women were expressing the aspiration for selfhood and fulfillment but that this did not attempt to transform the web of gender and class relations in which they were situated. Women did not attempt to challenge their situation explicitly, nor didthey even realize they were challenging their social condition. At the same time, attendance at particular popular dance halls and club events served to reinforce the notions of female submission and some Old Word traditions. Overall, however, we can see that the changes in society everywhere this period of 1880-1920 benefited women. Look at how family life changed because of the movie theater experience. It brought families together husbands and wives would attend with their children. Also, we can see that clubs and dances were safe places to meet those of the opposite sex, whereas previously, you may have had a husband chosen for you. It can be said with confidence then that the challenges implicitly mounted by women s search for leisure has indeed benefited their position in the late 19th and early 20th centurysociety.

A Look At Cheap Amusements Essay -- essays research papers

An extremely interesting, but ever-contradictory sociological study of sexual relationsis presented in the Kathy Peiss book Cheap Amusements . The reason I say that it is ever-contradictory is that the arguments are presented for some(prenominal) the benefit of cheap amusements for a woman s place in society and for the reinforcement of her place. In one breath, Peiss says that mixed-sex cheer could be a source of autonomy and pleasure as well as a cause of a woman s continuing oppression. The following arguments will level that, based on the events and circumstances described in Cheap Amusements , the changes in theways that leisure time is spent by women has indeed benefited them in both the workplace and at home. This position requires a closer look at specific leisure activities where and with whom they are spent, and the ultimate effect that these activities had on society and sexuality roles. More significantly however, is how the establishment of leisure activities for wo men came about, rather than the simple change in availability of such activities. First let s look at Peiss s position on the matter of how cheap amusements challenged gender traditions in the tardily 19th and early 20th centuries.What does Peiss have to say about women s roles at the turn of the century? Peiss argues initially that young women experimented with new cultural forms in terms of sexual expressiveness and social interaction with men, linking heterosocial culture to a awareness of modern individuality and personal style. Creating this style was an assertion of self. Peissquickly discounts these assertions by saying that without economic independence, such freedoms are hollow. Peiss s essay claims to focus on the role of working women in fostering change from a homosocial to a heterosocial culture, but as we can see from the earlier quote, there is still what seems to be a hint of male dominance in preventing the experience of true leisure. By this we can see that Peiss believes women were challenging gender norms, but doing so down the stairs the implied watchful eye of the male-dominated culture.One very interesting point that Peiss makes is that there is now a market for leisure time. This market included such activities as attending shows at a nickelodeon, riding the trolley, and, especially in Manhattan, spending the day at Coney Islan... ...not explicitly challenging the social conditions of the day, but implicitly doing so. I agree with Peiss s statement that women were expressing the aspiration for selfhood and fulfillment but that this did not attempt to transform the web of gender and class relations in which they were situated. Women did not attempt to challenge their situation explicitly, nor didthey even realize they were challenging their social condition. At the same time, atten dance at particular popular dance halls and club events served to reinforce the notions of female submission and some Old Word traditions. Overall, howeve r, we can see that the changes in society over this period of 1880-1920 benefited women. Look at how family life changed because of the movie theater experience. It brought families together husbands and wives would attend with their children. Also, we can see that clubs and dances were safe places to meet those of the opposite sex, whereas previously, you may have had a husband chosen for you. It can be said with confidence then that the challenges implicitly mounted by women s search for leisure has indeed benefited their position in the late 19th and early 20th centurysociety.